View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
sarahislahf
Joined: 11 May 2010 Posts: 21
|
Posted: Tue May 18, 2010 6:09 am Post subject: pullman strike |
|
|
shall we start a topic for pullman-postings? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Free Forum
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Hey_look_its_EVAN
Joined: 07 May 2010 Posts: 20
|
Posted: Tue May 18, 2010 6:12 am Post subject: |
|
|
yes we shall |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
sarahislahf
Joined: 11 May 2010 Posts: 21
|
Posted: Tue May 18, 2010 6:22 am Post subject: |
|
|
wellll
i was a bit curious about what demographic of the immigrant workers was like, and how that shaped what was going on at the time. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
zatkinsweltman
Joined: 09 May 2010 Posts: 27
|
Posted: Tue May 18, 2010 6:36 am Post subject: |
|
|
these ideas in this packet really reelate to the railroad ideas and are really about the industrial revolution. Unfortunately it seemed people had trouble keeping things going strong so they had to lay off people and decrease wages. Too bad they had to use Violence. I wonder, Based on the question in the packet, If they really could have done this in a more civilized manner without any blood shed? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
BChangy
Joined: 07 May 2010 Posts: 33
|
Posted: Tue May 18, 2010 6:41 am Post subject: Economic concepts |
|
|
Based on the reading about the two main concepts of productive industrialist I am curious about "social Darwinisim" and "laissez-faire".
Social Darwinism is "economy, like the natural world, was a system in which only the strong could survive"
Laissez-faire ment "the economy should be allowed to develop 'naturally' without interferance from the government"
The two suggest gaining all the percks of their industry withought the set backs that could prevent them from making a large sum of money. The fact that they wanted to exclude the government from their process shows their greed to deny the rest if their country...isint there some kind o law against laissez-faire? Do businessmen/women still go by these concepts today? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
mswartz
Joined: 07 May 2010 Posts: 43
|
Posted: Tue May 18, 2010 6:45 am Post subject: Response |
|
|
In response to Sara's question, on page 68 it says that, " More than three out of four factory workers were first-or-second generation immigrants." I think this affected things because when people went on strike from the union, they could always hire the immigrants to replace them. They probably wouldn't demand as much pay. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
BChangy
Joined: 07 May 2010 Posts: 33
|
Posted: Tue May 18, 2010 6:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
Yeah Zack I love that you pointed out the fact that people had trouble keeping things goin strong...we talked about that it my class. We said that because there was again tHis delicate balance of trying to keep the south unnder northern power and help the nation stay as a whole everyone was trying new things to make sure that people were content. They would continuously try new things until the point where they realized it wasn't working. WorsT trial and error ever |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
BChangy
Joined: 07 May 2010 Posts: 33
|
Posted: Tue May 18, 2010 7:12 am Post subject: |
|
|
Sorry one more thing I don't mean to hog the forum but the text is shouting at me
[quotes] a system of slavery as absolute if not as degrading as which lately prevailed in he south...maufacturing capitalists threatened to become the masters, and it is the white laborers who are to be slaves". [/quote]
I hope imnot the only one who is struck bythis quote fro. The New York Times. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Jessica.Santos
Joined: 07 May 2010 Posts: 21
|
Posted: Tue May 18, 2010 7:57 am Post subject: |
|
|
i agree with zach on the fact that a lot of the information that i pulled out of the packet had to relate with railroads. I think that was the biggest industry that profited and lost. Due to the progress that it made for or our country, but also the hundreds of thousands of people who died, got hurt, or were treated poorly. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Jessica.Santos
Joined: 07 May 2010 Posts: 21
|
Posted: Tue May 18, 2010 7:58 am Post subject: |
|
|
OH i totally missed briana's point. those few sentences were the ones i remember most, such an interesting concept. i am unsure how to think of it. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
YUJIA
Joined: 07 May 2010 Posts: 14
|
Posted: Tue May 18, 2010 8:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
I think this material connects to the events before the Civil War on the aspect that the labor force changed from Black slaves to white "slaves". Both were treated badly and earned little. What seems to be new is that the Pullman Strike is nation wide and the government is against the workers. The political and economic influence that they were seeking for cost a lot of deaths and injuries as well. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
dokim
Joined: 07 May 2010 Posts: 23
|
Posted: Tue May 18, 2010 9:51 am Post subject: |
|
|
I wonder how much did George Pullman earned through from his town which he constructed.
Also, when labors protested how they performed it in peaceful and violence way? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
edalven

Joined: 07 May 2010 Posts: 37
|
Posted: Tue May 18, 2010 4:50 pm Post subject: Eli 5/17 |
|
|
dokim wrote: |
I wonder how much did George Pullman earned through from his town which he constructed.
Also, when labors protested how they performed it in peaceful and violence way? |
I'll try my best to answer these. I think that Pullman must have gotten fabulously wealthy from his town. He essentially ruled it like a king, and he had 12,000 subjects who payed him taxes. He cornered the market on their lives, and gained a fortune. However, his inability to negotiate with workers led to a huge strike that cost him his company.
I think the Pullman Strike was peaceful for the most part, but eventually President Grover Cleveland ordered federal troops to the factory, to diffuse the tension. However it says that over 30 people were killed. I can't find where that is mentioned again in the packet. A more violent strike occurred in 1877 when railroad workers clashed with state militias, and over 100 people died.
What is the Gilded Age?
How did this conflict really end? The reading doesn't go into detail...
Some theses I pulled from the reading:
"The conflicting interests, values, and strategies led to many important moments of labor conflict in the last quarter of the nineteenth century."
"The national crisis, the railroad collapse, limited government help for the unemployed, and Pullman's decision to cut wages help set the stage for the Pullman Strike." |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Jaehyouk
Joined: 07 May 2010 Posts: 22
|
Posted: Wed May 19, 2010 4:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
What could be the best (peaceful) ending for the Pullman strike?
I thought talking about this point would be interesting.....
share some of idea! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
shawks
Joined: 12 May 2010 Posts: 12
|
Posted: Wed May 19, 2010 7:36 am Post subject: |
|
|
I like what has been said so far. I think peaceful unity is the best way to go. It sounded like the best idea to threaten to quit jobs and work for a different company, maybe not during the depresions, though. I don't know. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Free Forum
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|