Author |
Message |
Topic: last post ever! due 12/15 |
carterp
Replies: 14
Views: 3055
|
Forum: LACW Mod 3 Posted: Tue Dec 15, 2009 2:48 pm Subject: last post ever! due 12/15 |
Even though I agree with the reading a believe that it presented Reagan in a pretty biased light. The first sentences of the packet were dedicated to showing his ignorance towards latin america and po ... |
Topic: due 12/10 pages 35-39 |
carterp
Replies: 15
Views: 2723
|
Forum: LACW Mod 3 Posted: Thu Dec 10, 2009 9:00 am Subject: due 12/10 pages 35-39 |
This reading reminded me of the view point that I had to represent yesterday, I believe it was saying that the U.S. should not intervene because in the end it would be same. With Carter trying to limi ... |
Topic: Due 12/07 |
carterp
Replies: 16
Views: 2913
|
Forum: LACW Mod 3 Posted: Mon Dec 07, 2009 5:31 pm Subject: Due 12/07 |
I enjoyed this reading even if it was a little dry, but over all it seemed unbiased. As people have mentioned before there is a stark contrast between Kennedy policies and ideas for latin america and ... |
Topic: Due 12/04 |
carterp
Replies: 16
Views: 3028
|
Forum: LACW Mod 3 Posted: Fri Dec 04, 2009 12:06 pm Subject: Due 12/04 |
The letters gave a much more personal (obvious) and reasonable account of the thought process to the solving of the Cuban missile crisis. These letters affirmed some of my thoughts from last nights po ... |
Topic: Due 12/03 |
carterp
Replies: 16
Views: 2641
|
Forum: LACW Mod 3 Posted: Thu Dec 03, 2009 11:54 am Subject: Due 12/03 |
Even though I was in the blockade option group, I honestly believe that it was the best option. As is outlined in the reading the U.S. is unsure of what it is up against, and the blockade leaves the m ... |
Topic: Due 11/23 |
carterp
Replies: 13
Views: 1615
|
Forum: LACW Mod 3 Posted: Mon Nov 23, 2009 10:41 am Subject: Due 11/23 |
I found this reading very interesting over all. But as Sophie said it did seem a little biased even though i have no doubt that that is how it happened, the over all tone seemed a little anti-US. Whic ... |
|