View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
historydepartment Site Admin
Joined: 14 Sep 2009 Posts: 8
|
Posted: Thu May 06, 2010 11:03 pm Post subject: Responses Due 5/7 |
|
|
Responses Due 5/7 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
edalven

Joined: 07 May 2010 Posts: 37
|
Posted: Fri May 07, 2010 5:36 am Post subject: Eli 5/6 |
|
|
I had part one of our reading, called Slavery, Sectional Strife, and War. It said that "one issue much more than any other split the nation: slavery. Particularly, the issue of westward expansion was the impetus for the national controversy. In a nutshell; The North, who supported Lincoln, wanted the new territories to be free states, but allowed slavery to continue in the "Old South". The South, who apposed Lincoln, would not accept this compromise and seceded from the Union. I believe this was the main cause of the Civil War. As for the strengths and issues of the United States in the early nineteenth century, I came up with some lists from notes and such.
Strengths
Victory over England in War of 1812
New Immigrants and Expanding Borders
Industrial Revolution
Transportation and Exploration
King Cotton and Textiles
Middle Class and African American Culture
American Values: Individualism
Issues
Slavery
Racism
Persecution of Native Americans
Women's Rights and Roles
Religious Tensions
Political Tensions |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
BChangy
Joined: 07 May 2010 Posts: 33
|
Posted: Fri May 07, 2010 6:02 am Post subject: |
|
|
Why did the north support Lincon? What created this seperation between a country that was suppose to be united? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
edalven

Joined: 07 May 2010 Posts: 37
|
Posted: Fri May 07, 2010 6:39 am Post subject: |
|
|
BChangy wrote: |
Why did the north support Lincon? What created this seperation between a country that was suppose to be united? |
Making America page 281 The Divided Nation
"The Republicans were a new phenomenon on the american political scene: a purely regional political party. The party drew its strength and ideas almost entirely from the North." Abraham Lincoln was the first Republican President.
Although the country was founded on such ideals as unity and brotherhood, it is so vast that regional differences can escalate so much that they create tensions between countrymen. American society is full of different groups that don't agree with each other. I would say when people in power favor personal or local interest over national interest, divisions occur. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
BChangy
Joined: 07 May 2010 Posts: 33
|
Posted: Fri May 07, 2010 6:55 am Post subject: |
|
|
Correct me if I am wrong, you said, "when people in power favor personal or local interest over national interest, divisions occur[s]," the fact that Lincon was in favor of Republican veiws instead of the entire country's views, lead to division in the United States.
The idea suggest that Lincon being human caused the country to fall apart. This goes back to question: What makes a government work? Allowing a single man who may sway to a particular view have power over a country was the biggest issue of the 1800's if you look at it this way.[/quote] |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
mswartz
Joined: 07 May 2010 Posts: 43
|
Posted: Fri May 07, 2010 7:04 am Post subject: Response to Brianna and Eli |
|
|
Brianna, you asked why the north supported Lincoln. Just adding onto what Eli said, I felt people who were pro slavery had a very all or nothing type of attitude. At one point they said it was a " do or die" situation and on page 38 of the westward expansion packet it says, " Southern planters, on the other hand, came to see control of the West as essential to the survival of slavery." With the idea of all or nothing, Lincoln had an uncompromising position against the expansion of slavery(in the west) Concluding, the south did not support Lincoln.
Eli, you mentioned that "The Republican party drew its strength and ideas almost entirely from the North." I found that quote pretty ironic considering that present day (I believe) the North to be more democratic than the south. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
BChangy
Joined: 07 May 2010 Posts: 33
|
Posted: Fri May 07, 2010 7:23 am Post subject: |
|
|
You pulled from the text the quote: " Southern planters, on the other hand, came to see control of the West as essential to the survival of slavery." and concluded that: "With the idea of all or nothing, Lincoln had an uncompromising position against the expansion of slavery(in the west)."
The question seemed to be on everyones mind (like the text says on page 14 of "Slavery, Sectional Strife, and War") "What would happen to the balance of power between the free states and slave states in the U.S. Senate?"
Everyone was worried about themselves, going back to my response to Maddy's post that the biggest issue during this period was the worry of a balanced economy. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
zaronson
Joined: 07 May 2010 Posts: 17
|
Posted: Fri May 07, 2010 7:45 am Post subject: Response to Martha's comment |
|
|
This is just a side note to Martha's comment "Eli, you mentioned that "The Republican party drew its strength and ideas almost entirely from the North." I found that quote pretty ironic considering that present day (I believe) the North to be more democratic than the south"
FUN FACTTTT
This is true that many people usually think of northern states as blue (democratic) and southern states as red (republican). But at one time the democratic party was most prominent in the southeastern part of the country until now being very strong in the Northeast, Great lakes region and pacific coast. another FUN FACT is that it is the largest political group in america with almost 72 million Americans (thats about 42% of the U.S. Populations) where as 55 million (about 32% of the U.S. Population) Americans are Republicans |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Hey_look_its_EVAN
Joined: 07 May 2010 Posts: 20
|
Posted: Fri May 07, 2010 9:00 am Post subject: |
|
|
Is it just me or did alot of thier strengths cause the issues |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Free Forum
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|